[Tf-curation] [TF-CMDI] next CMDI best practices meeting

Menzo Windhouwer2 menzo.windhouwer at meertens.knaw.nl
Wed Sep 13 11:54:06 CEST 2017


Hi, All,

Thanks for all the feedback! I’ve incorporated most of them and otherwise kept them as comments in the Word document [1], and we’ll discuss them after the CAC.

The draft is now available at:

	https://office.clarin.eu/v/CE-2017-1076-CMDI-Best-Practices.pdf
or via
	https://www.clarin.eu/content/cmdi-best-practice-guide

See you at the CAC (please help to gather feedback at our CMDI stall at the bazaar) or the next vidconf!

Menzo

PS I’ll be working on the CAC presentation this week and hope to send it to the co-authors of the abstract for feedback later!

[1] https://datashare.rzg.mpg.de/s/QRK45Ikx6WvjnKR 
--
www.meertens.knaw.nl/cms/medewerkers/144709-menzowi

On 12/09/2017, 18:14, "Alexander König" <Alexander.Koenig at eurac.edu> wrote:

    Hi Menzo, Twan, et al.,
    
    I went through the draft and only have a couple of remarks. I didn't get
    around to do fancy PDF notes like Twan, so I will simply reference the
    page/section.
    
    
    general remark:
    "middle priority" sounds really weird to me. I would prefer "medium
    priority" instead
    
    page 5:
    - "if you have good local requirements" sounds a little bit weird, maybe
    rather "good reasons to deviate from the recommendations"
    - CLARIN provides the following tools and services 3. should say
    "insight into the quality of CMD profiles"
    
    page 14 top:
    "these components are included in the group 'recommended' and can be
    displayed in the standard component registry"
    I see only two recommended components and one profile (when I search for
    'recommended' in the search box). I assume the plan is to extend these.
    Maybe the draft of the document should mention that this is also "in
    progress".
    
    P4:
    "The CMDI allows"
    The article, though technically correct, seems weird. I would remove it.
    
    3.4:
    "using tools such as CMDI Maker, COMEDI and Arbil"
    Two of these are no longer developed, with the CMDI Maker only being
    able to cater for 2 profiles, only one of which is actively used
    (AFAIK). I think it would be good to mention this caveat here, so people
    know what to expect.
    
    
    best
    Alex
    
    
    On 11/09/17 16:43, Twan Goosen wrote:
    > Hi Menzo, all,
    > 
    > Thanks for the updated version, nice to see the document already in a
    > reasonably complete state! I have annotated the PDF version with a
    > number of small remarks. None of them are really urgent, so they can
    > also be considered for processing after the CAC.
    > 
    > A general thing that we have not discussed before IIRC: maybe it would
    > be good to harmonise the mood of the 'titles' of the best practices.
    > Now, some of them are imperative ('Include a MdSelfLink') while others
    > are indicative ('The MdSelfLink should be a PID'). I like the former
    > better although I don't have a strong preference either way, but I do
    > think it would be nice to have a consistent style.
    > 
    > If you could send me a copy of the (Word) document towards the end of
    > the week, I will print a few copies and bring them to Budapest so that
    > people can have a look at the bazaar.
    > 
    > Best,
    > Twan
    > 
    > On 08/09/2017 15:01, Menzo Windhouwer2 wrote:
    >> Hi, All,
    >>
    >> You can find the latest version of the draft CMDI Best Practice guide (CE-2017-1076) here:
    >>
    >> 	https://datashare.rzg.mpg.de/s/dDvZZUl6YM1Tdyl
    >>
    >> Changes include:
    >>
    >> - Alignment in handling hyperlinks, references, etc.
    >> - Removed impact of CLARIN B Centre requiements from the priorities
    >> - Worked on reasons for high priority (needs references)
    >> - Reassigned priorities (as proposed/discussed)
    >>
    >> Feedback is still welcome! Preferably early next week, so we can make it available on the CLARIN website on Wednesday, well in time for the CAC.
    >>
    >> Many thanks in advance,
    >>
    >> Menzo
    >> --
    >> www.meertens.knaw.nl/cms/medewerkers/144709-menzowi
    >>
    >> On 31/08/2017, 17:06, "Menzo Windhouwer2" <menzo.windhouwer at meertens.knaw.nl> wrote:
    >>
    >>     Hi, All,
    >>     
    >>     Thanks to all who could attend the meeting today!
    >>     
    >>     We’re about to finish the CAC abstract. There will be another review round before submitting it tomorrow. This round will be in round robin style among the participants of today’s meeting. Please contact me if you couldn’t make it today but still want to participate.
    >>     
    >>     Also the draft of the guide was discussed. Suggested changes will be incorporated and a new version will be send around next week. The main remaining point of attention are the priorities for the best practices.
    >>     
    >>     The next meeting will be a physical one:
    >>     
    >>     	18 September 2017, 11.30 - 13.00 CEST at the CAC17 in Budapest, Hungary
    >>     	
    >>     See also:
    >>     
    >>     	https://trac.clarin.eu/wiki/Taskforces/CMDI/Meeting20170918 
    >>     
    >>     Feel free to make suggestions for the agenda!
    >>     
    >>     Regards,
    >>     
    >>     Menzo
    >>     --
    >>     www.meertens.knaw.nl/cms/medewerkers/144709-menzowi 
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Tf-cmdi mailing list
    >> Tf-cmdi at lists.clarin.eu
    >> https://lists.clarin.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tf-cmdi
    >>
    > 
    
    



More information about the Tf-curation mailing list